Suggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Bone scintigraphy is commonly used to assess the extent of bone metastases; its use is limited in monitoring of treatment efficacy because it is an expensive, time-consuming technique.
Routing in wireless multihop networks represents a crucial component of the overall network efficacy because it is a lower layer that enables the actual functionality of networks.
However such a tolerance system is of short term efficacy because it is driven by consumption of NAD(P H/ATP pools.
▪ A score between -0.5 and +0.5 indicates a lack of evidence of efficacy because it is obtained in case of conflicting evidence or when a majority of poor-quality trials are available.
We have chosen to evaluate differences in general self-efficacy rather than parenting specific efficacy because it is this broad construct that we believe will be promoted by the POWs.
▪ A score greater than 0.5 but less than or equal to 1 corresponds to limited evidence of efficacy because it is obtained when a majority of medium-quality trials exist in the presence of a maximum of one positive high-quality trial or when a single positive high-quality trial is available.
Similar(54)
Let's not throw out the need to demonstrate safety and efficacy because it's just too expensive".
For vancomycin, CI can be chosen, not always for better clinical efficacy, but because it is practical, cheaper, associated with less AUC24h-variability and easier to monitor.
For vancomycin CI can be chosen, not always for better clinical efficacy, but because it is practical, cheaper, associated with less AUC24h (area under the curve >24 h -variability, and easier to monitor.
This study is therefore a pragmatic trial, not an efficacy trial, because it is not the intention to evaluate new interventions [ 47].
In many studies, an estimate of effect size and standard deviation of the measurement may not be readily available, particularly if efficacy is unknown because it is a new or developing intervention, or if the trial is in a new target population.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com