Sentence examples for effects proportion from inspiring English sources

Ceiling and floor effects (proportion of respondents with the best and worst possible theoretical scores, respectively) were calculated for the EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Ceiling effects (proportion of subjects scoring at the highest possible scale level) were also negligible, although 6.5% of the subjects scored at the maximum scale level of the social subscale.

Distribution of WHODAS-2 and SF-36 scores was evaluated for the whole sample: means (SD), observed range, percentage of patients with missing domain scores, and floor and ceiling effects (proportion of patients with the worst and best possible score, respectively).

N, number of study groups; SRR, summary relative risk estimate; CI, 95% confidence interval based on DerSimonian and Laird model estimates; PI, 95% prediction interval [details in supplementary note (see Additional File 3)]; τ, among-study variance; CI, confidence interval; Pr(OE), opposite effects proportion *, For details please see text.

The corresponding ceiling effects (proportions of adults who scored maximum) were 0.6% and 0.1%.

The surrogate threshold effect proportion (STEP), proposed by Lassere [ 1], is also a relative measure, and is derived from its absolute measure, the surrogate threshold effect (STE).

Table 3 provides a summary of the descriptive statistics: range, floor effect (proportion with score of 0), mean and standard deviation values.

Proportions of studies with Positive and Negative Effect of CCG versus NCCG are shown in Figure 2. In the selected 45 articles the positive effect proportion of CCG was 0.64 (p = 0.053) [see Additional file 2].

A reanalysis of the data using random effects models produced similar results to the fixed effect (proportion of total variability explained by heterogeneity (I) was 16% for the FDA data and 0% for the journal data).

The excellent rank statistical evidence specified in the BSES requires high trial-level association of treatment effects, high individual-level associations and high surrogate threshold effect proportion (STEP) between the surrogate endpoint and the true clinical endpoint.

Thus, if sounds had no effect, proportions of FTV responses should be similar in all sound conditions.