The effects of these interventions in day-to-day practice are nevertheless often unclear.
However, combined effects of these interventions in patients suffering from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are unknown.
Few studies have evaluated long-term effects of these interventions; none have assessed broad-scale implementation.
However, the comparing effects of these interventions have not been reported in previous studies.
How best to measure the effects of these interventions is, however, unclear.
However, there remains uncertainty regarding the effects of these interventions on household air pollution concentrations, personal exposure concentrations and health outcomes.
Nevertheless, since the middle of the 1980s, the potential effects of these interventions for youth with an ID remain an open question.
However, because the extant research has not systematically accounted for the separate effects of language of instruction versus type of intervention, very little can be concluded about how these factors contribute to the positive main effects of these interventions.
In addition, we suggest a variety of methods to measure the effects of these interventions on gender norms in the community for example, policy analysis, multilevel modeling, and social conversations.
Further research is required to determine which motor interventions are the most effective in improving motor outcomes and/or cognitive and social outcomes, and on the longer term effects of these interventions in people with S-PID.
However, the effects of these interventions on survival and functional status remain uncertain.
