Sentence examples for effects of row from inspiring English sources

Simulation results for warm thin permafrost (mean annual ground temperature above − 1 °C; 20 m thick) indicate that the combined effects of ROW disturbance and climate warming are likely to result in permafrost degradation within 20 to 40 years, and ROW-disturbance effects may extend off-ROW under scenarios of climate warming.

The difference between ledge transformation and typical phase transformation is compared using this model and the effects of row spacing, temperature and segregation energy are discussed.

Studies were conducted to examine the effects of row spacing and stubble height on surface soil water content, water use, yield, and water use efficiency of canola and wheat in the drier regions of the Canadian prairies.

For the range in ground thermal conditions considered, the results of the simulations indicate that the effects of ROW disturbance outweigh those associated with climate warming in the initial 10 to 15 years following disturbance, although climate warming becomes important over longer time periods.

In this study, 23 treatments were arranged using an orthogonal rotatable central composite design to model a seepage time series, build a simple seepage prediction model and investigate the effects of row grade, field slope and ridge height on seepage discharge.

Clonal repeatability and genetic correlations were calculated as described previously [ 62], except excluding the effects of row and column position in the experimental design.

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of crop row spacing (11, 15, and 23-cm) and weed emergence time (0, 20, 35, 45, 55, and 60 days after wheat emergence; DAWE) on Galium aparine and Lepidium sativum growth and wheat yield losses.

The covariates are fixed effects of rows, columns and diagonals in an a×p table with one response in each cell.

A limited set of scenarios consider the effect of: ROW clearing alone; ROW clearing followed by vegetation recovery; ROW clearing combined with climate warming of 0.5 °C per decade; and ROW clearing followed by vegetation recovery combined with climate warming.

Firstly, the effect of row number on the fouling results were discussed.

This paper reports the effect of row direction and sensor position on G magnitude and variability in an irrigated row crop of cotton.