Linear regression was conducted to examine the overall effects of interview condition, recall interviewer and time between feedback and recall interview.
Another study objective was to determine whether the effects of interview mode differed by partner gender.
In the second set of analyses, we specifically examined the effects of interview mode on the responses to cancer screening indicators.
We examined effects of two interviewing strategies (police/verbal interviews and clinician/prop-assisted interviews) on young children's reports about a medical examination.
There was no main effect of interview-to-blood sample interval, neither between nor within subjects.
The results confirm the finding of Gielen and Van Ours (2014) using German data: they also find no effect of interview time since unemployment on Δ H a p. Upon losing their job, workers report, on average, a fall in their subjective well-being, and this fall is higher for men than for women.
For categorical variables that had significant differences between interview methods the effect of interview order was assessed using simple test of proportions.
With a less conservative cut point of 11, there was no significant effect of interview admission.
However, they were not included in analyses of the effect of interview mode on reports of cancer screening behaviours.
No prior studies have examined the effect of interview mode, or the effect of mode ordering on the responses of subjects to questions related to their community reintegration.
