Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
David Farabee, professor of psychiatry at the University of California Los Angeles, who has studied the effects of coercion on treatment for decades, notes that much of the data here is confounded by what scientists call a "selection effect".
Similar(59)
An explanation might be that the interviewees assessed the direct effects of coercion in a bilateral rather than in a multilateral case.
The implication is that the beneficiary effects of coercion are harder to defend.
Little is known about factors that could buffer the negative effects of coercion.
Despite the widespread and controversial use of coercion in psychiatry, little is known about the impact of coercion on outcome.
Still, the knowledge of the impact of coercion on outcome is limited [ 1].
The overall effect of these differences is to focus the analysis of coercion on how the coercee is affected by it, rather than on what the coercer does, and what is required for him to do it successfully.
The knowledge of the impact of coercion on psychiatric treatment outcome is limited.
The impact of coercion on treatment outcomes and the appropriateness of aftercare provision require further consideration.
Basic in BOPZ is the intention to rule the use of coercion on a citizen by another citizen.
Some regarded involuntary admission as necessary to provide care, but considered the treatment effect of coercion as uncertain.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com