In JSCE 2009, on the other hand, a safety factor for member γ b (=1.1) addressing the effects of accuracy in section analysis/design, variations in member size, and the importance of the role of the member, is used along with the safety factors for materials (i.e. γ c = 1.3, γ s = 1.0, and γ r = 1.0; see Table 1).
No main effects of accuracy (F 4,20) = 2.7, NS; Fig. 5B) or ITI bin by strain interactions (F 4,40) = 1.4, NS) were observed.
In the analysis of the swallowing ease score, the ANOVA revealed significant main effects of Accuracy (F 1,210) = 6.8, P <.01), and Beverage (F 2,210) = 35.7, P <.01) as shown in Figure 6(c).
Analysis 4. To test the effects of accuracy of the auditory verbal cues on swallowing parameters, we used a three-way ANOVA with Accuracy (correct, incorrect), Beverage (apple, water, aojiru), and Age (young, elderly) as independent factors.
Analysis 2. To test the effects of accuracy of the auditory verbal cues on flavor scores, we used a two-way ANOVA with Accuracy (correct, incorrect), Beverage (apple, water, aojiru) as independent factors.
In the analysis of the taste score, the ANOVA revealed significant main effects of Accuracy (F 1,210) = 6.5, P <.05) and Beverage (F 2,210) = 140.6, P <.01), as shown in Figure 6(a).
The effect of accuracy improvement was verified by experiments using simulated and real data.
An ANOVA yielded a significant effect of accuracy (F2, 38 = 158.569, P < 0.0001).
In the younger group, there was no effect of accuracy on this interval.
We also tested the effect of misspecification of s for its effect on accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), yet allowing for inference on the other hyperparameters.
The effect of a fixed breed effect on accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction was also studied by running the base model including breed as a fixed effect.
