Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(52)
Program effectiveness was evaluated every 3 months, with emphasis at baseline evaluation (T0), intermediate evaluation (12 weeks—T1) and post-intervention assessment (24 weeks—T24.
The recycling effectiveness was evaluated through the indicator of effective recycling ratio which is put forward by laboratory test.
Acute effectiveness was evaluated in all patients with remission for all evaluable SPG stimulation attempts (i.e., those with completed electronic headache diary data; sham and sub-perception attempts during the randomized, controlled experimental period were excluded).
The effects of underlying pulmonary conditions on event occurrences were analysed before PPV23 effectiveness was evaluated.
Subjective and objective treatment effectiveness was evaluated.
Their effectiveness was evaluated by reference to homogenous packages.
Similar(8)
Cost-effectiveness was evaluated by comparing differences of total medical costs and effects on NPI, CB and CCL (Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio: ICER).
Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a societal perspective.
Cost-effectiveness was evaluated by calculating cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) compared to current practice.
The cost-effectiveness was evaluated by the bioprocess economics model, as described in the previous section.
Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at example willingness to pay values of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com