Sentence examples for effectiveness of surrogates for from inspiring English sources

There were differences between study areas in terms of the effectiveness of surrogates for different test feature groups.

In general, the effectiveness of surrogates for our taxa (mostly threatened species) was low, although environmental units tended to be more effective than forest ecosystems.

Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Brooks, T. M. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: the effectiveness of surrogates.

Any differences that we find in apparent effectiveness of surrogates in these highly similar regions will therefore have large implications for our ability to generalise from one region to another, considering that differences between most study regions are far greater.

Grantham, H. S., Pressey, R. L., Wells, J. A. & Beattie, A. J. Effectiveness of biodiversity surrogates for conservation planning: different measures of effectiveness generate a kaleidoscope of variation.

We found that the effectiveness of surrogates was sensitive to all of them.

Therefore, uncertainties in implementation could alter the apparent effectiveness of surrogates.

Previous work points to further factors that might interact with testing method to influence the apparent effectiveness of surrogates.

We identified four factors likely to have a strong influence on the apparent effectiveness of surrogates: (1) the choice of surrogate; (2) differences among study regions, which might be large and unquantified (3) the test method, that is, how effectiveness is quantified, and (4) the test features that the surrogates are intended to represent.

Therefore the analyses consider the relative effectiveness of surrogates in achieving the remainder of species targets, given the fixed contribution from existing reserves.

Previous studies have shown that the choice of testing method can influence the apparent effectiveness of surrogates [e.g. 28], [39].