Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(18)
Other research in this area, such as systematic reviews of adherence interventions [ 5], tends to report that the evidence for the effectiveness of adherence interventions is either limited, short lived in duration of effect, or both.
Increasing the effectiveness of adherence might have more substantial impact on clinical outcome than improvement in specific medical treatments [27].
The study is a review of 38 systematic reviews of the effectiveness of adherence interventions published between 1990 and 2005.
The first question will be answered by assessing the effectiveness of adherence interventions on the basis of systematic reviews.
Significant differences in the effectiveness of adherence interventions were found in 23 of the 38 systematic reviews.
We are unaware of any systematic studies of either the prevalence or effectiveness of adherence aids in diabetes.
Similar(42)
The aim was to analyze the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing pharmacist interventions for oral medication in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Thus, further studies of high quality are needed to assess significant effectiveness of adherence-enhancing pharmacist interventions care, especially against the background that the study quality of the included trials in this review are deficient [ 14, 49, 50].
Therefore, it was sought to perform a systematic review on randomized controlled trials analyzing the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions involving pharmacists for oral medication in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Randomized controlled trials, including cross-over and cluster-randomized trials, which tested the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions in an intervention group versus a control group receiving no intervention, e.g., usual care.
We therefore examine the cost-effectiveness of adherence therapy for people with schizophrenia by multi-centre randomised trial in Amsterdam, London, Leipzig and Verona.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com