Sentence examples for effectively siding from inspiring English sources

Then the British Conservatives and the French led 27 nations in effectively siding with the fascist coup against the duly elected, if inept, government of Spain.

In recent months, the Syrian opposition has accused the United States of effectively siding with Mr. Assad by teaming up with Russia and focusing only on hitting designated terrorist groups and not the government, whose warplanes have leveled rebel-held areas, hospitals and civilian homes in indiscriminate strikes.

There, Angle defeated Cage after Styles attacked Cage, effectively siding with The Angle Alliance.

Styles then hugged Cage, before springboarding off the top rope and bashing Cage in the back of the head with his forearm, effectively siding with The Angle Alliance.

Moscow accuses Washington of effectively siding with other militants that are no different from Islamic State; Washington says the Russian campaign helps Islamic State by targeting its rivals.

In a 12-page opinion, Justice Garnett denied the request to release the documents in the Garner case, effectively siding with Staten Island District Attorney Dan Donovan, whose office had argued that their release would lead to an "inevitable result of harassment or retaliation".

So far, the Brotherhood has effectively sided with the military, in an alliance of two of Egypt's most venerable institutions.

In the letter, sent earlier this week, Mr. Galbraith suggested that Mr. Eide effectively sided with Mr. Karzai at critical junctures in the campaign, playing down credible reports of widespread fraud and preventing United Nations staff members from intervening to prevent it.

But Prior went public with an angry denial that he had effectively sided with Pietersen against the leadership of Cook and the team director, Andy Flower, before the fourth Test in Melbourne, after being accused by Morgan of stabbing Pietersen in the back.

A deputy high court judge since 2009, he ruled last year effectively sided with critics of Prince Charles's interference in architectural matters by ruled that the Qatari royal family's property company breached a contract over the controversial £3bn Chelsea barracks development, a scheme criticised by the Prince of Wales.

The suit's central claim is that by using state money and resources, including National Guard troops, to hire, transport, house and pay replacement workers, the Rowland administration effectively sided with the 39 privately run nursing homes, giving their owners an unfair advantage in the collective bargaining process with union leaders.