Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(29)
It was considered that Cardio inCode® would be cost effective compared with the standard method for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (willingness of the NHS to pay) less than €30,000 (or €36,000 updating the 2002 value to the year 2011) per QALY gained or per LY gained without adjusting for its quality [ 41].
It was found to be significantly less effective compared with the reference treatment, both in the immediate and the sustained effect [ 15].
The proposed method is simple and effective compared with the pole restriction method.
Results: Initial EGD was more expensive but more effective compared with the no screening strategy.
The numerical experiments indicated that the model and algorithm presented in this paper are effective compared with the lower bound, the currently used method and the method raised in previous studies.
In vitro transfection of murine brain capillary endothelial bEnd.3 cells with pSPE, pTETA, and pLPEI polyplexes was 2.3 4.9 times more effective compared with the non-degradable LPEI 22 kDa reagent (ExGen500) in the presence of serum.
Similar(31)
The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicates that the probability of the aprepitant regimen being cost-effective, compared with the UK comparator regimen, is 79%and92%2% at "willingness-to-pay" thresholds of £20,000/QALY and £30,000/QALY, respectively.
This result is highly cost-effective compared with the recent threshold (Jonsson, 2004) for cost-effectiveness.
Traditional health economic analysis would calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to explore whether the additional dose is cost-effective compared with the current 2-dose schedule.
These developed methods were simple and cost-effective compared with the manufacturer's RP-HPLC method.
CONCLUSION: From a societal perspective, palbociclib treatment for both patient groups (with and without prior endocrine therapy) is highly unlikely to be cost-effective compared with the usual care in the United States.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com