Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

effected with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'effected with' is not correct.
The correct phrase is 'affected by.' You can use this phrase to describe how an event, action, or occurrence is influencing someone or something. For example, "The town was greatly affected by the flood."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Forming was effected with the qualified procedures and pressurizing media.

The modulation is effected with a haunting tug.

News & Media

Independent

"This is a reform which could only be effected with the support of the states.

News & Media

The Guardian

Keneally argued social change is best effected with community consensus not compulsion.

News & Media

The Guardian

Directional changes are effected with all the lithesome agility of a sinking tugboat.

News & Media

The New York Times

Indeed, the beheading was positively subdued, effected with a couple of downward runs of the accompaniment.

This test marked a step up in the North's threats, something usually effected with words alone.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Therefore, a modal shift from private to public transport needs to be effected with urgency.

"The renovation will be effected with the respect that the building deserves".

News & Media

The New York Times

Bonding could be effected with the square, 0.85 and 1.10 mm screw pitched stirrers.

The frequency synchronization is effected with a 1Ø Phase Locked Loop (PLL).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "effected with". Instead, use "affected by" when describing influence, or choose more precise verbs like "achieved by", "implemented with", or "carried out with" for clarity.

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "effected with" when they mean "affected by". "Effect" is primarily a noun meaning result, while "affect" is a verb meaning to influence. Remember, something is "affected by" something else; it is not "effected with" it.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "effected with" is typically intended to function as a passive construction, indicating the means by which something is brought about. However, Ludwig AI points out this phrase is incorrect, the proper wording being affected by.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

42%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

8%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "effected with" appears in numerous contexts, ranging from science to news media, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase to use when intending to express influence is "affected by". Alternatively, phrases like "achieved by", "implemented with", or "carried out with" can be used to describe the means by which something was accomplished. Despite its relatively high frequency of use, particularly in scientific and news-related content, it is important to use the correct terminology to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity.

FAQs

How can I use the word "affected" in a sentence?

The word "affected" is a verb that means to influence or produce an effect on something. For example, "The town was greatly "affected by" the flood" or "His decision "affected the outcome" of the game."

What is the difference between "effect" and "affect"?

"Affect" is primarily a verb meaning to influence, while "effect" is primarily a noun meaning a result or consequence. While "effect" can also be used as a verb, it means to bring about or accomplish, which is different from the meaning of "affect".

Is it ever correct to use "effected" in writing?

Yes, "effected" (the past tense of the verb "effect") means to bring about or accomplish. For example, "The new policy "effected change" in the organization." However, it shouldn't be confused with "affected", which means to influence.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "effected with"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "achieved through", "carried out with", or "implemented using" to describe how something was accomplished. If you intend to express influence, use ""affected by"" instead.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: