Sentence examples for effect of subjectivity from inspiring English sources

We argue that the effect of subjectivity on fairness perceptions follows an inverted U-shaped relationship, consistent with the idea that subjectivity increases fairness perceptions when the overall emphasis on subjective measures is relatively low, but that subjectivity decreases fairness perceptions when the overall emphasis on subjective measures is relatively high.

Disagreements were discussed and, if no agreement was reached, a third reviewer was consulted to break the tie and so moderate the effect of subjectivity in the assessment.

However, any effects of subjectivity were minimized through the thematic analysis of the interviews, in which we collated themes expressed by the interviewees and discussed them in the context of the policy domains to provide generalized insights.

Detailed formulation of the introduced features is presented in Section 5. Before giving the formulation of the feature set in this section, we should remark that the subjective nature of the emotion forces researchers to employ a reference criteria which scales the effect of this subjectivity.

In order to minimize the effect of coder subjectivity, 10% of the comments from each article were coded by two coders.

Our results represented the combined effect of cultural subjectivity and expectations of physicians.

However, the effect of this subjectivity had been cushioned by allowing two independent assessors with the same socio-cultural background with the children in each case of the clinicians and care-givers to reach a consensus on a particular child following the criteria highlighted in the procedure section.

Apparently (different) assessors pick up measurement information that is relatively generalizable across individual encounters, while at the same time broad sampling across assessors evens out the effects of assessor subjectivity.

However, it is difficult to objectively quantify the effect of this cultural subjectivity on our measures without a population-based 'gold standard'.

I suspect the real issue here is one of subjectivity.

Considering this confounder, method comparison can only show that method C is no worse than methods A and B. The effect of the influence by the subjectivity of readers is most distinct in method A (see table 2).