Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(11)
This study examined the effect of picture concreteness on visual recognition memory processes using event-related potentials (ERPs).
With regard to the reaction time data, a main effect of Picture was found, F 1,37) = 6.28, p<.05 indicating that participants generally responded faster to smoking-related Go trials than to neutral Go trials (M = 259.69 ms versusM = 261.89 ms).
There was also a significant effect of Picture Type, F (4, 75) = 8.87, p < .001.001
Valence ratings analysis revealed no significant main effect of Group, F < 1, but a significant main effect of Picture Type, F (4, 344) = 607.66, p < .001.001
A one-way ANOVA was computed to analyze the effect of picture type (positive, neutral, negative) on induced emotional reactivity during the attending task.
There was also a significant effect of Picture Type, F (4, 81) = 4.15, p < .01, but no Picture Type by Group interaction, F < 1.
Similar(47)
In the current study, we examine the joint effect of pictures, food names, and individuals' information processing styles on consumers' attitudes, willingness to pay, and purchase intentions.
In a 2 (group: subclinically depressed and controls) × 3 (picture-type: high impact, low impact and neutral) repeated-measures ANOVA of recognition scores corrected for false alarms, the effect of picture-type was significant, F 2,76) = 24.215, MSE = .017, p < .001, η p 2 = .39; neither the effect of group nor its interaction with picture-type was significant (all Fs < 1).
We did not include in our review studies which compared the effect of pictures of nature versus pictures of more synthetic environments, however, such studies have been conducted [ 52, 53], and this approach may prove useful in providing some indication of the most relevant environmental attributes.
No main or interaction effects of Picture were found for accuracy of responding.
No main or interaction effects of Picture were found for accuracy of responding in either NoGo or Go trials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com