Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The effect of compatibility on the improvement of the toughness of polyphenylenesulfide (PPS) blended with styrene ethylene butylene styrene block copolymers (SEBS) has been studied.
Similar(59)
There was no significant main effect of participant group or a significant difference between the compatibility effects between participant groups on zRT as indicated by the Jonkheere-Terpstra test for monotone trend in group medians (both p > .15) nor a main effect of compatibility (p > .30, evaluated by the Wilcoxon-signed-ranks test in any of the respective participant groups).
ANOVAs showed that the main effect of compatibility was not significant.
Importantly, the authors predict that the effects of brand compatibility on conflict and life satisfaction will depend upon relationship power.
The effects of compatibility between different satellite systems on availability are discussed.
In this group, the post hoc effects of compatibility yielded statistical significance.
Therefore, early effects would be explained by anticipatory effects of compatibility between motor preparation and sentence content.
In order to investigate the effect of interfacial compatibility and bonding on the mechanical properties of the fabricated inorganic organic composites, platelet surfaces were modified with both epoxy- and amino-functional silanes.
Both imitative and spatial compatibility effects were apparent on response times; however, the effect of imitative compatibility was significantly stronger, indicating less control of imitation, during stimulation of the rTPJ relative to the control site.
There was a significant main effect of spatial compatibility, whereby responses were faster on trials where task-irrelevant stimuli were spatially compatible with the required finger lift (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]; 437 ± 14 ms) compared with incompatible (500 ± 15 ms), F1,15 = 65.53, P < 0.001, η = 0.81.
There was also a significant main effect of imitative compatibility, whereby responses were faster on trials where task-irrelevant stimuli were imitatively compatible with the required finger lift (462 ± 14 ms) compared with incompatible (470 ± 15 ms), F1,15 = 11.44, P = 0.004, η = 0.43.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com