Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The intervention (between-group) effect for change in weight was of a medium size ds = 0.57.
After controlling for age, gender, and BMI, only the effect for change in 2hPG remained significant (Table 5).
Similar(58)
A significant time effect for changes in lean (P = 0.007) occurred, though there were no significant group (P = 0.31) or group by time interaction (P = 0.21) effects for changes in lean.
The program costs a fraction of other evidence-based practices yet statistical effect sizes for change over time are comparable.
We hypothesised a corresponding effect size for change in BMI and shuttle run performance.
Interaction terms in the two tables provide effect estimates for change over the two survey rounds.
The effect size for change in OHIP-14 score was large; however, for JSS score it was moderate.
The computed effect size for change in LSI for the exercise group in all those five studies was large.
Effect sizes for change in BMI were large for all sites but there was a two-fold difference in the size of the effect between some sites.
Effect sizes for change in DTSQ-s total scores at week 30 were 0.84 for exenatide QW compared with 0.64 for exenatide BID.
The computed effect size for change in LSI was small-to-medium for the intervention group and trivial for the control group.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com