The mean (SD) educational duration of the participants was 6.97 (4.96) years (range 0 25 years).
The lowest prevalence of prolonged sitting was reported among participants aged 66 years and older (13.2%), women (12.7%) and women with an educational duration of 10 years (11.2%).
For men, sitting time in the lowest income group was lower than in the highest income group (p <. 05) and participants with an educational duration of 13 years or more had longer sitting times than participants with 10 and 12 years of education (p <.05).
The covariates included in the model were participants' sex, age, race, marital status, educational level, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) status, and self-rated health.
In addition, ESARO collected information on the population covered by CHWs as well as their educational level, duration of general health training, and sex.
Analysis was adjusted for marital status, educational level, duration of injecting, sharing needles or syringes, and injections by a nonmedical provider.
Independent variables included: sex, age, educational level, duration of illness (hypertension/T2D), family history of CDs, regular attendance at health institutions, and whether health information and self-care instruction was received.
Covariates modeled as predictors of mortality and functional disability status included measures of participants' sex, age, race, marital status, educational level, duration of diabetes, CVD, and self-rated health.
In addition to collecting information on the main study domains (see below), the questionnaire covered basic demographics and descriptives that include county, gender, age, educational level, duration of employment in addiction treatment field, caseload and treatment modality (in-patient/out-patient).
A series of multivariate logistic regression models predicting the combined 2-year mortality and functional disability status were calculated after controlling for the covariates of participants' sex, age, race, marital status, educational level, duration of diabetes, CVD, and self-rated health.
After controlling for potential confounding variables of age, educational status, duration of HIV diagnosis and awareness of cervical cancer in a multivariate logistic regression model, it showed that women who had more than secondary education were 1.4 times likely to accept to take the test as compared with those who had less than secondary education (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.03-1.84).
