Typically a major concern of any assessment system, is its validity, and there are many models that are widely used in medical education, for example, Van Der Vleuten's utility index which explores reliability, validity, educational impact, acceptability, feasibility and cost [ 26].
The results are presented according to the three objectives for the study that explored the portfolio's educational impact, acceptability and use in assessment.
The aim of this study was to explore the views of registrars and supervisors regarding the portfolio's educational impact, acceptability, and perceived usefulness for assessment of competence.
The aim of this study was to explore registrars' and supervisors' experience regarding the portfolio's educational impact, acceptability, and perceived usefulness for assessment of competence.
Qualitative feedback (questionnaires and semi-structured interviews) on the use of the portfolio will be obtained from registrars, family physicians, other supervisors and managers in terms of the tool's educational impact, acceptability, and perceived usefulness for assessment purposes.
The aim of this study was to investigate the portfolio's acceptability, educational impact, and perceived usefulness for assessment of competence.
The fitness for purpose of the FACT, in terms of configuration, reliability, validity, educational impact and acceptability will be qualitatively analysed.
Balancing the different elements of reliability, validity, acceptability, educational impact and costs, and the needs of stakeholders in reaching a compromise is inherent to the model [ 8].
The second part of the interviews focused on the configuration, reliability, validity, educational impact and acceptability of the FACT, to provide an opportunity for healthcare advocacy.
- be socially acceptable (acceptability pillar).
