Area-based socio-economic factors pertaining to the size of population, gender, type of occupation, education, size of household of the people living in an area, and income explain the spatial prevalence of HEVs.
Previous studies suggested that several confounders such as the level of education, size of place of residence, intelligence and motivation of experimental subjects could bias the TCI dimensions.
The variables obtained from these sources refer to income, inequality, education, size of the population and other characteristics of the areas of analysis.
Associations between MDR-TB and sex, country of birth, education, size of the household, history of imprisonment and smoking in the past 5 yrs were not found to be statistically significant (table 4).
Our study was able to circumvent this difficulty, since there were relatively few significant differences between low and normal birth weight newborns taking into account almost all of the indicators of social and economic conditions, such as education, size of municipality, social and familial support whereas they were found to be reliable predictors of very LBW compared to LBW.
The questionnaire consisted of closed and open-ended questions, including age, sex, education, size of cultivated land, crops cultivated, pesticides and alternatives used, knowledge, attitudes and practice when buying, handling and storing pesticides; perceived negative impact from pesticides; and own experience with poisoning after handling pesticides.
A structured questionnaire was set by administering the various socioeconomic (e.g., sex, age, income, level of education, family size, land ownership, landholding size, distance between the houses of the respondents and the nearby access road, etc).
All the questionnaire survey was achieved by considering various socioeconomic (e.g., sex, age, income, level of education, family size, annual income, land ownership, landholding size, etc).
In diabetes, adherence to dietary regimens also improved with education (effect size d+ 0.57), but the effects on weight loss were much smaller (effect size d+ 0.17) [ 45].
Mother's education (effect size = 0.70 + for literacy and numeracy), and the Home Learning Environment (measured at age 3 4) (effect size = 0.68 literacy; 0.42 numeracy) are the strongest influences upon children's attainment.
If we believe in the beautiful variety of people then we must accept that when it comes to education, one size does not fit all.
