Sentence examples for editors claim that from inspiring English sources

And yes, the editors claim that they too have had to reject some submissions.

The reader might take issue with the editors' claim that the railway is "as  close as earthly things get to perfection" – as indeed do many of the poets and songwriters on board – but there are plenty of nostalgic pleasures to be had here.

And so far the bloggers and booksellers have been enthusiastic, going along with the Doubleday editors' claim that it is "a tale of unbearable suffering and ultimate redemption, a love story that spans centuries and renders the ordinary laws of probability … irrelevant".

Like many of their peers, JGIM editors claim that "the quality of the papers published in the Journal depends on both the authors and the external reviewers who help the editors select the best papers and improve their presentation".[3] We distinguish here between reviewer recommendations (i.e. accept/revise vs. reject) and reviewer comments (narrative assessment and suggestions for improvement).

One might add that this argument is sometimes even taken too far, for example when the editors claim that "by dynamically relating decision-making at the micro-level to social structures and institutions at the meso- or macro- level this approach avoids individualistic as well as ecological reductionism" (p. 294).

Another major point of contention is rest periods, known in the industry as "turnaround". Editors claim that despite some improvements, the contract doesn't adequately address issues including sleep time, getting home safely and personal time between shifts.

Because "it was the outside propaganda of the Jews, led by The Times," the editor claimed, "that had made it necessary to lynch Frank".

Student officers said they wanted to improve the newspaper, while Bull's Eye editors claimed that the officers were retaliating for articles critical of their campus activities.

A survey in North American survey found that 21% of journals editors claimed that they did not review advertisements provided by the industry before their appearance in the journals [79].

"There's a lot of different stuff being published". He admits that agents have been grumbling about the demand for pyrotechnic prose-- of the David Foster Wallace variety"--but that he's also heard similar mutterings from editors who claim that's all the y're seeing.

The Mail on Sunday editor claimed that "a substantial sum on money" had been paid to Mr Whittamore during the years he worked for the Mail titles.