Sentence examples for editorial review process from inspiring English sources

And more specifically, how can the numbers of women and other underrepresented groups be increased to match their numbers in the ranks of research scientists? 1 In this article, current and former editors of bioscience journals comment on the editorial review process, describe how editors and reviewers are chosen, and offer concrete suggestions on how to get involved in editorial review.

When projects are published in the monograph series, the DFRs go through an editorial review process which is conducted between the editors, reviewers and authors.

"Initial wording in an article and press releases generated by Cornell University that indicated outside funding sources was an unfortunate error missed during the editorial review process".

The Editorial Review Process.

It is regrettable that neither the authors nor the editorial review process identified these errors.

Between 1997 200202 the CISMeF gateway selected health resources using the main criteria established by the Net Scoring initiative (source of information, disclosure, editorial review process, date of last update, and feedback mechanism) in view of the fact that the selection process is mandatory to create a trustworthy health Internet directory.

We propose that differential assessment of men and women is one important factor in explaining this stalled progress, reflected in gendered institutional policies and apparent implicit bias in promotion and editorial review processes.

The editorial and review process with Communications Biology will be honest, transparent, and constructive, regardless of the final outcome.

Our in-house editors and Editorial Board Members have worked hard to meet our goals of delivering timely decisions and maintaining communication with our authors throughout the editorial and review process.

The editorial and review process for this Special Issue of Applied Adhesion Science permitted to join the well-founded theoretical and experimental work of the authors to provide a widened view on present technological progress especially related to phenomena of adhesion and adhesives in biomedical areas and for environmentally compatible applications.

A Nature spokeswoman said the journal does not comment on its editorial or review process, and that dissenting opinions are published only after the arguments have been peer-reviewed.