Sentence examples for editorial experts from inspiring English sources

Laura founded Editorial Experts, an editorial services firm.

In an accompanying editorial, experts cautioned that the research is not the final word on fish oils.

With a robust team of editorial experts in commenting, Hannah and Guardian developers and designers started the week by thinking about the barriers to entry for those who don't comment on guardian.co.uk.

"Specialists from our Story DNA machine learning teams collaborated with our editorial experts to find stories and writers with exceptional potential for Wattpad Next," a spokesperson said.

Its influential and authentic social media properties afford brand advertisers unique access to impassioned and engaged audiences through a blend of professional editorial, expert opinion, user contributions and customized marketing solutions.

In blogs, letters, and editorials, experts and advocates have been busy dissecting the implications of this and scores of other proposed revisions, now available online, including new diagnoses that include "binge eating disorder," "premenstrual dysphoric disorder" and "attenuated psychosis syndrome".

No appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of editorials (experts' opinions) since these are generally considered to be the lowest possible level of evidence.

Abstracts, letters, editorials, expert opinions, reviews without original data, case reports, and studies lacking control groups were also excluded.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies conducted on animals; (2) studies that evaluated mRNA expression or DNA polymorphisms of GPC3 and did not provide the sensitivity or specificity of using GPC3 as a HCC marker; (3) letters, editorials, expert opinions, and reviews without original clinical data; (4) case reports and studies lacking control groups; and (5) duplicate reports.

working group membership consists of interested and materially affected groups, including voting machine manufacturers, voting system software developers, computer scientists (including two of the three cited in your editorial), security experts, citizen advocate groups, disability advocate groups and election officials.

In these editorials, the "experts" voices were not included at first hand, but embedded in the policy-makers' voices, as they cited research studies to support their claims.