Any attempt to maintain ecological integrity and diversity in the 21st century then, must therefore include recourse to economics and economic actors, just as any attempt to maintain economic stability and prosperity must recourse to ecology and ecological actors.
However, increased competition for land increases the risk of local conflicts that involve non-state actors, since it can reduce actor's ecological space.
Conceptual framework integrating (I) degrees of participation the methods provide Pretty et al. ([1995]:61), (II) types of ecological knowledge of different actors, and (III) eight dimensions of values related to different categories of ecosystem services and benefits (Chan et al. [2012], p.13).
For instance, Ingold et al. (2010) showed that existing local policy projects give high consideration to regional planning as well as communal and economic interests, while most of the actors defending ecological concerns are not well embedded in the relevant information-exchange networks.
The following actors were involved: Actors with local ecological knowledge are the men and women in the villages.
The concept takes into account modern socio-cultural trends and factors influencing the educational changes and is based on the conceptual synthesis of system-functioning, ecological-evolutionary and actor-network approaches.
The actor having policy ecological knowledge is the provincial government of Jambi that aims for economic development of its territorial domain.
One set indicates the awareness of actors to consider ecological principles of sustainable planning.
At the core of the framework is a set of basic building blocks (motifs) that each represents a simplified but non-trivial social ecological systems (SES) consisting of two social actors and two ecological resources.
Actors with local ecological knowledge are the men and women in the villages.
