Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Discrepancies between the two reviewers were solved by having a third author (EC) review to reach consensus.
Studies were excluded if they met the following exclusion criteria (EC): Review papers.
Critics of the EC review also debated whether endocrine-disrupting compounds have a threshold concentration below which no health effects are seen.
The authors wrote the commentary after observing the uproar last year following a preliminary European Commission (EC) review of its policy on endocrine-disrupting compounds.
For instance, one point of contention over the EC review was whether evidence of toxicity in animals should be presumed to predict human effects in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
Elliott and coauthor David Resnik, a bioethicist at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, decided to use the conflict over the EC review to illustrate how personal ideals are embedded in the very nature of research itself.
Similar(52)
NV and EC reviewed medical charts and finished consolidating the data.
EC reviewed the histology.
EC reviewed drafts.
MWK, TJM, MP and EC reviewed and edited the manuscript.
In these cases, the central EC reviews the application in its original version.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com