Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
Subscale scores for restraint and shape, weight and eating concern range between 0 6.
The questionnaire assesses specific ED psychopathology on four subscales, which are restraint, eating concern, weight concern and shape concern.
The EDE- Q assesses specific ED psychopathology on four subscales, which are restraint, eating concern, weight concern, and shape concern.
27 The EDE-Q is a 36-item questionnaire comprising four subscales (restraint, eating concern, shape concern and weight concern), a global score and a specific section of diagnostic questions related to bingeing/purging.
The EDE contains four subscales (dietary restraint, eating concern, shape concern and weight concern) associated with core psychopathology of eating disorders; weight: height and weight were measured at baseline by the assessor.
The Eating Disorders Examination- Questionnaire (EDE-Q [ 14], ) is a 36-item measure of dysfunctional behaviour and cognitions related to eating, with four sub-scales, eating concern, shape concern, weight concern and restrained eating, and a global eating disorder score.
Similar(39)
Underlying issues included relationship difficulties, family problems, work concerns, sexuality, bereavement, sexual abuse, financial worries, domestic violence, eating concerns and alcohol/drug use.
The etiology of eating concerns is multifactorial, and exposure to media messages is considered to be a contributor.
Although traditional media, such as television and magazines, have been examined extensively in relation to eating concerns risk, the influence of social media has received relatively less attention.
The EDE-Q assesses behavioural and attitudinal features of ED over the preceding 4 weeks and comprises four subscales: restraint, eating concerns, weight concerns and shape concerns.
Exceptions were excessive exercising and eating concerning which about one third of those reporting the problem also stated that they sought professional help to cope with their problem.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com