end{aligned} Applying the same procedure in the remaining two equations of system (1) and omitting the hats for easy notations, we consequently obtain the following system: left { textstylebegin{array}{l} frac{dx}{dt} =cy-mu_{2}x+ frac{p_{1}xz}{1+z}+s_{1}, frac{dy}{dt} =r_{2}y-frac{axy}{1+y}, frac{dz}{dt} =frac{p_{2}xy }{g_{3}+y}-mu_{3}z+s }{g_{3}+y}-mu_{3}z+s _{2 }
If you print out a copy, have it double-spaced to allow for easy notations.
This appendix, however, uses only rates, not percentages, for easier notation.
For the sake of an easier notation, it is assumed here that a layer corresponds to a single row of the parity-check matrix.
For simplicity reasons and for making the mathematical notation easy to follow, we denote the following: P SR i by P 1 i, P RD i by P 2 i, γ SR i by γ 1 i, γ RD i by γ 2 i, Ω SP i by Ω 1 i, and Ω RP i by Ω 2 i.
To make the notation easier, let's use Q for sqrt(19).
So, that means, well, life looked quite nice and easy with these notations.
We still haven't made it easy to type notation-laden sentences, so the potential benefits were low.
To make the notation easier, we index each measurement in {Z n } k by i such that i represent the ith element in the set of measurements {Z n } k, that is 0≤i<k.
Here, we explain the grouping mechanism in comparison with grouping in western notation for easy understanding of readers.
