ease to

USAGE SUMMARY

'ease to' is not a correct and usable phrase in written English.
In order to use 'ease' correctly in a sentence, it must be followed by a verb, such as "ease the transition" or "ease the burden." For example, "We hope that the new policy will ease the transition to the new system."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

A slow ease to things.

The Guardian - Books

I'm surprised to find myself at ease to some extent.

Independent

Murray holds his serve with ease, to love.

The Guardian - Sport

Economists had predicted that CPI would ease to 2.6%.

The Guardian - Business

They bring a conversational ease to their songs, while resisting the temptation to make frenzy cute.

The New York Times

He has a beautiful voice with such ease to it, no sense of production.

The New York Times

They bring an elastic ease to his compositions, periodically landing on a backbeat groove.

The New York Times - Arts

"How much will they have to ease to get things back on track?

The New York Times

Meanwhile, the traffickers slip through with ease to pursue their criminal activities.

The New York Times

There was no ease to either of them, and their combination often produced a volatile misery.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

The sensor has been combined with versatile, simple, ease to-fabricate microfluidics.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express simplicity or reduced difficulty, substitute "ease to" with grammatically correct alternatives such as "easy to", "simple to", or rephrase the sentence for clarity. For example, instead of "The problem is ease to solve", use "The problem is easy to solve".

Common error

A frequent error is using "ease to" when "easy to" is grammatically correct. Always verify that "easy" functions as an adjective describing the simplicity of an action or task. For example, it's correct to say "It is easy to understand", not "It is ease to understand".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ease to" functions primarily as an incorrect prepositional phrase. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect, noting it should be followed by a verb or replaced with "easy to". Despite its prevalence in some contexts, its usage deviates from standard English grammar.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

40%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "ease to" appears in a variety of sources, it is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as non-standard. Although attempts using the phrase "ease to" typically aim to convey simplicity or reduced difficulty, the correct phrasing is usually "easy to" or a similar alternative, like "simple to" or "straightforward to". Be especially careful not to substitute "ease to" for "easy to" when describing something that is not difficult. Despite its frequent usage, especially in News & Media and Science contexts, prioritize grammatical correctness and opt for established alternatives to ensure clarity and credibility in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

easing to

While maintaining the idea of facilitation, focuses specifically on the process of making something less difficult.

eased to

Refers to diminishing or alleviating something, not simply making it easier to interact with or understand.

ease of use to

Highlights the user-friendliness aspect, focusing on how easily something can be utilized.

convenience to

Centers on suitability or advantageousness, differing from the broader concept of simplicity.

simplicity to

Focuses on the aspect of uncomplicated nature, highlighting a shift towards lack of complexity.

accessibility to

Highlights making something easily available or reachable, differing from pure ease.

lessen to

Emphasizes reduction in amount, degree, or intensity; whereas "ease to" implies facilitation, not necessarily quantitative decrease.

slacken to

Emphasizes a decrease in intensity or effort, varying from just making something simpler or easier.

cushion to

Suggests buffering or protecting, rather than simplifying or facilitating.

allay to

Focuses on calming or reducing intensity, a more emotional sense of ease as opposed to practical simplicity.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "ease to" in a sentence?

Replace "ease to" with "easy to" when describing something that is not difficult to do or understand. For example, change "The task is ease to complete" to "The task is easy to complete".

What are some alternatives to using "ease to" in a sentence?

Instead of "ease to", use phrases like "simple to", "straightforward to", or "effortless to" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "ease to" grammatically correct?

No, "ease to" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct phrasing to indicate simplicity or lack of difficulty is "easy to". Ludwig AI identifies this issue and highlights the incorrectness of the phrase.

How does the meaning change when using "easy to" instead of "ease to"?

While "ease to" is grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear meaning, "easy to" conveys the idea that something can be done or understood without difficulty. Substituting with a phrase like "simple to" ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.