Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Additional B-scan images (not shown) demonstrate the same representative increases in PT-OCT signal in GNR + mouse ears compared to control injections.
Similar(59)
(F ) Mafb null mutants develop a small and cystic inner ear compared to control littermates.
Topical application of GCSE on the ears of AD-induced mice significantly reduced ear thickness, clinical score and lymphocytes infiltration to ears as compared to control group.
In addition, a DTH test was executed and all rats showed a good DTH response with a significant (P = 0.001) increase in ear thickness of the right ear at 6, 24, and 48 hours after injection compared with the control left ear) and compared to control rat ear's injected with saline (data not shown).
Children in the prebiotic and probiotic fortified group showed a statistically significant 5% fewer days with high fever and 7% lower prevalence of ear discharge compared to control group.
There is a dramatic increase in PT-OCT signal in the experimental ear where GNRs are present compared to control ears with Matrigel only.
presented significant reduction of edema and vasodilation and also moderate reduction in infiltration of inflammatory cells comparable to dexamethasone) while CPM at 1 mg/ear) showed slight improvement when compared to control inflamed ear).
As shown in Figure 2F (data from a representative experiment), the ear thickness in mice topically sensitized twice with DNCB was increased by 82% at 24 h after DNCB challenge compared to control animals, whereas the ear thickness in mice with triple sensitizations was increased by 113%.
Similarly, at 24 h after DNCB challenge of the ear (note that the ear had no prior exposure to DNCB), significant ear swelling was also readily observed in animals previously exposed to DNCB compared to control animals (Figure 1C).
a P < 0.05 compared to control (ANOVA; LSD post hoc); AE = Aqueous extract; Values of ear edema shown are Mean ± SEM (n = 10).
*p < 0.05 compared to control.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com