Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Previous studies focusing on size-earnings relation typically have found that employees of larger organizations earn more than those who work for smaller employers, and many propositions have been made to explain this relationship.
Previous empirical research has typically focused on size-wages or size-earnings relation.
This can be achieved by controlling province dummies when addressing the size-earnings relation.
Thus, further attention and examination should be paid to this size-earnings relation.
Individual characteristics had no impact on the size-earnings relation in 1996 but did reduce the size-earnings correlation in 2006; on the contrary, organizational characteristics partly explained the size-earnings relation in 1996 but lost this influence in 2006.
This change lay in the relative power of organizational vs. individual characteristics as the explanatory factors for size-earnings relation.
The third question was about the temporal change of the size-earnings relation from 1996 to 2006.
Others extended the analysis on size-earnings relation by investigating the temporal change or cross-national variation.
Therefore, more work needs to be done to explain the observed size-earnings relation in urban China.
According to these two criteria, it is clear that the research population for the topic of size-earnings relation is actually wage earners.
Following the traditional approach in the research field of size-earnings relation, the urban samples of both datasets were further restricted in two ways.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com