earmark funds for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "earmark funds for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in financial or budgeting contexts to indicate that specific funds are set aside for a particular purpose or project. Example: "The government decided to earmark funds for infrastructure improvements in the upcoming fiscal year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

Many current tax proposals earmark funds for schools.

The Economist

A congressman has the power to "earmark" funds for a specific project.

The Economist

Donors also prefer to earmark funds for specific purposes, like combating H.I.V. and AIDS, health care for women or environmental problems.

The New York Times

The idea of going to a biennial budget is already gathering steam on Capitol Hill, but efforts to tamper with the right of appropriations committees to "earmark" funds for specific projects are likely to encounter strong resistance.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

They have, however, passed military appropriations bills that earmark funds for the effort against the Islamic State, which could suggest that lawmakers have acquiesced to the executive branch's theory.

The New York Times

The USOC doesn't normally earmark funds for a particular athlete.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

President Trump's new deadline for Congress to earmark funding for his proposed border wall is Feb. 15.

The Washington Post

Action Item 6: Earmark funding for multidisciplinary research.

Science Magazine

Obama refused to specifically push any special initiatives or earmark funding for unemployed blacks.

Huffington Post

Earmark funding for transition M&E.

Global health, science and practice

The ministry has earmarked funds for such operations in this year's budget.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about financial matters, be specific about the amount of funds being earmarked and the exact purpose. For example: "The city council decided to "earmark funds for" the new park project, allocating $5 million for construction and $1 million for maintenance."

Common error

Avoid vague statements about earmarking funds. Instead of saying "The organization will "earmark funds for" future projects", specify which projects and the intended amounts. This increases transparency and accountability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "earmark funds for" functions as a verb phrase, indicating a deliberate action of setting aside money for a particular purpose. As Ludwig AI confirms, this expression is usable in written English. It highlights the intention to allocate resources for specific objectives.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Academia

8%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "earmark funds for" is a commonly used and grammatically correct expression that signifies the allocation of financial resources for a specific purpose. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's broadly applicable in written English. Predominantly found in news, media, science and business contexts, it serves to communicate budgetary decisions and resource allocations. When using this phrase, it's best practice to be specific about the amount and purpose of the funds to ensure clarity and transparency. Alternatives like "designate funds for" or "allocate funds for" can be used to achieve a similar meaning. Avoiding vagueness in earmarking statements will help ensure clear understanding and accountability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

earmark funding for

This alternative uses 'funding' instead of 'funds', slightly altering the grammatical structure while maintaining the same meaning.

allocate funds for

This alternative is more formal and emphasizes a systematic distribution process.

designate funds for

This alternative suggests a more official or authoritative assignment of funds.

assign funds for

This alternative is direct and emphasizes the act of giving funds for a particular use.

allocate resources to

This alternative broadens the scope from just funds to resources, implying a wider distribution.

appropriate funds for

This alternative is related to government and legislative processes, indicating a formal allocation.

set aside funds for

This alternative emphasizes reserving or protecting funds for a specific future use.

dedicate funds to

This alternative emphasizes a strong commitment of funds towards a purpose.

devote funds to

This alternative highlights a purposeful allocation of funds towards a specific objective.

channel funds to

This alternative emphasizes directing the flow of funds towards a specific cause or project.

FAQs

How can I use "earmark funds for" in a sentence?

You can use "earmark funds for" to indicate that specific funds are being set aside for a particular purpose. For example, "The government decided to "earmark funds for" education reform."

What's a good alternative to "earmark funds for"?

Alternatives to "earmark funds for" include "designate funds for", "allocate funds for", or "assign funds for".

What does it mean to "earmark funds for" something?

To "earmark funds for" something means to reserve or designate money for a specific project or purpose. This ensures that the funds are used for their intended goal.

Is it better to say "earmark funding for" or "earmark funds for"?

Both "earmark funding for" and "earmark funds for" are grammatically correct, but "earmark funds for" is slightly more common. The choice often depends on the surrounding sentence structure and personal preference.