Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
With right ear stimulation in UHL, ipsilateral responses were larger compared to NH in core and belt ACFs, indicating neuroplasticity in the right hemisphere.
With left ear stimulation in UHL, only posterior core ACFs showed larger ipsilateral responses, suggesting that most ACFs in the left hemisphere had greater resilience against reduced crossed inputs from a deafferented right ear.
This unilateral direct inner ear stimulation completely removes the possibility of signal confusion.
The author proposed that the right ear advantage was due to the amount of efferent inhibition, which is relatively small in right compared to left ear stimulation.
In healthy subjects, the magnitudes of the force, velocity and displacement responses were not significantly different for left compared to right ear stimulation.
ASSR decrements were significantly different between ears during ipsi-lateral masking: decrements were more pronounced for left compared to right ear stimulation.
Similar(54)
During contra-lateral masking, binaural interactions between auditory neurons activated by left and right ear stimulations contributed to the significant N1m decrements.
The only other significant finding was an unexpected interaction between Image Acquisition and Ear of Delivery (F 2,16) = 4.35, p<0.04) which was due to larger ARMs following right-ear stimulation during continuous image acquisition and larger ARMs following left-ear stimulation during sparse image acquisition.
When using monaural presentation in left hemisphere injured patients, right-ear stimulation led to bilateral N1 reduction [ 35].
In a study using monaural stimulation, a similar pattern was found only for right-ear, but not for left-ear stimulation [ 35].
In healthy subjects there were small differences (<8°) in response direction for left-ear versus right-ear stimulation, which reached significance only for the displacement measure (Hotelling F = 4.53, p = 0.025).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com