Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(18)
Add the number of correct answers and subtract a quarter point for each wrong one.
For every wrong answer, the teacher could shock the learner, increasing the intensity of the shock for each wrong answer.
Each time the learner got a question wrong, the teacher would give them an electric shock, the voltage increasing by 15 volts for each wrong answer.
Through it all, the scientist in the room kept telling the participant to ignore the protests — or the unsettling silence — and administer an increasingly large shock for each wrong answer or non-answer.
Similarly, each wrong detection character is set in italics.
Note that each wrong detection character is set in italics.
Similar(42)
We click in most of the important ways, we rub each other wrong in a couple of ways, but mostly we crack each other up constantly.
But, what I would really like to come of this is not to make each other wrong, but rather to find a way to truly hear each other's concerns and evolve a cooperative response to this situation.
We always thought each other wrong and moved on to more pressing subjects.
A few simple lines of dialogue convey multitudes about how close and caring people can be, yet still get each other wrong.
Now that I have a little perspective on things, I can see where each went wrong: the Sonys were indistinct and muddled the mid-high end.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com