Sentence examples for each test were evaluated from inspiring English sources

Between-component differences in peak seating force, pull-out force and lever-out moment for each test were evaluated using independent sample t-tests.

The current specification parameter for each test was evaluated to establish the individual performance index (IPI).

By serially diluting confirmed strong BSE-positive material into a background of confirmed BSE-negative material, each test was evaluated over diminishing levels of an identical strain of BSE PrPsc in a consistent background of non-infectious PrPc.

Each test was evaluated dichotomously: negative/positive.

Each test was evaluated at the 0.05 alpha level (p ≤ 0.05 considered significant).

Therefore, each test is evaluated in units of SD of the reference group's change in performance.

The performance of each test was evaluated according to the area under curve (AUC) referent to the ROC curve and accuracy (AC).

Because so many comparisons were made, the significance of each test was evaluated at both the standard critical value of P < 0.05, as well as according to the Bonferroni-corrected version of P < 0.001, to minimise the chance of false-positives.

The clinical sensitivity (Cs), specificity (S), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for each rapid test were evaluated, and their respective 95%% confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated.

Seroconversion rates of each non-treponemal RPR test were evaluated on 23 syphilitic patients with a medical history of syphilis treatment.

Obtained data from shear bond strength test were evaluated statistically.