Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The resulting counts for each sample were collated to form a count table, consisting of one column for each fusion protein or Dam-only sample and one row for each GATC fragment.
Similar(59)
A list of the genotypes for each sample was collated and PHASE [ 28] was used to infer missing haplotypes.
Prior to the analysis, the geometric mean of processed four technical replicates (i.e., four hybridization with twice Cy3-labeled and twice A647-labeled) for each biological sample was collated as a single-channel dataset (Additional file Additional file 6: Table S4) and features were excluded if more than 50% of data was filtered out.
The sample was collated from the ICU discharges in 2014 and 2015, identifying those patients who were readmitted within 48 hours of discharge.
Ten samples were collated for each sample size (25 to 3600) for each questionnaire to produce an average for each of the four fit statistics (infit/outfit mean squares (MNSQ) and t-statistic (ZSTD in Winsteps)) for each item.
QC data obtained over a 3 month period during the analysis of 27 different batches of patient samples were collated for statistical evaluation.
The counts for all the samples were collated into one file and any gene with fewer than 5 reads in all samples was excluded from the subsequent statistical analysis of differential gene expression.
To carry out multi-array expression analysis for rice, normalised data from all 366 rice microarrays, representing 129 biological samples, were collated together and a probeset was considered to be expressed in a particular tissue/sample if at least 2 replicates for that sample showed statistically significant present calls (p < 0.05) [ 28].
The normalised data from all 373 microarrays (Table 1), representing 136 biological samples were collated together and a probeset was considered to be expressed in a particular tissue/sample if all replicates for every sample showed statistically significant present calls (p < 0.05).
The questions generated from each group were collated.
Monthly referrals to each service were collated and increases from 2012 to 2013 assessed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com