Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Each sample was categorized based on retrospective racecourse performance records.
Subsequently, each sample was categorized according to accompanying pathology reports with regard to ERα status, p53 status, presence of lymph node metastases (from TNM classification), and histological grade.
Each sample was categorized in one of three groups according to the following criteria: most of the cores had 0 and/or 1+ expression (Negative Group); at least 50% of the cores had 2+ expression and none had 3+ (Potential Positive Group); and at least one case had 3+ expression and none had 0/1+ (Positive Group).
Similar(57)
As the basement rocks in each geological block are generally considered as the source of younger detrital sediments in the block, each sample is categorized with respect to the geological block(s) exposed in its drainage basin (Fig. 8).
Finally, the identified SNPs from each sample were categorized according to their genotypes.
Using these identifiable features, the molt stage of each barnacle sample was categorized as being either pre- or post-molt.
Each articular cartilage sample was categorized according to its gross morphology as severely damaged and was taken from the main defective area of maximal load.
The sample was categorized as a Class F fly ash (XRF).
One sample each from the different layers were classified as moderately and dangerously polluted, while one lower layer sample was categorized as being seriously polluted.
The total sample was categorized in groups by three different ways.
Firstly, the sample was categorized as healthy subjects, out-patients and in-patients groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com