Exact(1)
Statistical analysis using Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) demonstrates the presence of unique gene expression profiles for each of these specimen classes.
Similar(59)
DNA divergences estimated for each of these specimens to the human reference genome (table S26) show that none of them differ significantly from the Vindija individuals, although these estimates are relatively uncertain due to the limited amount of DNA sequence data.
The tumor-cell content of each of these specimens was estimated by a pathologist and ranged from 5% to up to 95%.
The diagnostic value of each of these specimens may vary according to the population tested and laboratory method used.
Each of these specimens will be tested using a broad panel of diagnostic techniques that seek a large number of potential pathogens.
We present the historical and scientific accounts of each of these specimens with their respective laboratory results, which represent published and more recent data from the CDC Poxvirus Laboratory.
Compared with the corresponding original sequence from direct sequencing, no ITS heterogeneity was detected for clones from each of these specimens except for XZ-NQ-166 and XZ-LZ07-H1, whadh had three (23 clones) and 17 informative sites (15 clones), respectively (Table 4).
Each of these two specimens belonged to divergent subclades.
Exposé control of WSI shows that there are very small hot spots in each of these three specimens.
An organism identified as Photorhabdus sp. was isolated in pure culture from each of these operative specimens.
He preserved most of these specimens by traditional taxidermic means.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com