Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(28)
The aim of this review was to 1) identify all currently available side effect SRQs used in the assessment of mental health patients׳ subjective experiences, 2) evaluate the characteristics of the studies and 3) assess the psychometric properties of each of the questionnaires.
Separate consent forms were used for each of the questionnaires.
Each of the questionnaires consisted of two sections: a general and guideline specific part.
Each of the questionnaires was incorrectly completed, or refused, by one or more participants.
Participants will be asked to return each of the questionnaires within one week.
Table 3 shows the number of missing items for each of the questionnaires.
Similar(32)
Participants' ratings of each of the questionnaire items were averaged to produce a composite score.
Following this, patients were asked detailed debriefing questions about the definitions/meanings of terms, understanding/clarity of instructions and item wording, and the relevance of concepts captured in each of the questionnaire items.
All workers were classified as cases or non-cases according to each of the questionnaire and physical examination definitions.
This was a descriptive study: the results were analyzed in terms of frequencies of responses for each of the questionnaire items.
Paired t-tests were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the change between pre- and post-course scores for each of the questionnaire items.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com