Sentence examples for each item were categorized from inspiring English sources

The levels of comprehensibility for each item were categorized on a 4-point scale (0, not comprehensible; 1, slightly comprehensible; 2, moderately comprehensible; and 3, highly comprehensible).

The four grades for each item were categorized as: One point (little or no time with depression symptoms); two points (part of time with the depression symptoms); three points (most time with depression symptoms); four points (almost all of the time with depression symptoms).

Each item is categorized into a five point Likert scale.

Each item was categorized into one of two subscales (11 sensory items and 4 affective pain items), with the ratings for each subscale added to yield a total score between 0 33 and 0 12, respectively.

Based on the checklist guidelines, the quality of each item was categorized as either "High quality" (1 point) or "Low quality" (0 points) for a total possible score ranging between 0 and 8. Studies with higher scores were regarded as higher quality.

Those who scored at least four (which equates to an anchor of at least 'moderate' on this item) were categorized as SZ + FTD, those who scored three ('minimal') or less were categorized as SZ−FTD.

Patients who scored 3 or 4 (quite severe or very severe) on this item were categorized as having patient-rated sleep disturbance.

Responses to each of these items were categorized "Weekly" and "Every two weeks" which were included in the questionnaire.

If an item was classified as healthy or unhealthy in a majority of classifications presented by Hawkes, the item was categorized similarly as healthy or unhealthy.

If a food item contained fat from more than two categories or from undetermined sources, then the fat content of that food item was categorized as mixed/unclear.

FAO food items were categorized and summed to correspond to each of 12 GDD food categories (Supplemental Table 1).