Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(2)
Each item was categorized into one of two subscales (11 sensory items and 4 affective pain items), with the ratings for each subscale added to yield a total score between 0 33 and 0 12, respectively.
Based on the checklist guidelines, the quality of each item was categorized as either "High quality" (1 point) or "Low quality" (0 points) for a total possible score ranging between 0 and 8. Studies with higher scores were regarded as higher quality.
Similar(58)
Each item is categorized into a five point Likert scale.
The levels of comprehensibility for each item were categorized on a 4-point scale (0, not comprehensible; 1, slightly comprehensible; 2, moderately comprehensible; and 3, highly comprehensible).
The four grades for each item were categorized as: One point (little or no time with depression symptoms); two points (part of time with the depression symptoms); three points (most time with depression symptoms); four points (almost all of the time with depression symptoms).
If an item was classified as healthy or unhealthy in a majority of classifications presented by Hawkes, the item was categorized similarly as healthy or unhealthy.
If a food item contained fat from more than two categories or from undetermined sources, then the fat content of that food item was categorized as mixed/unclear.
Patients who scored 3 or 4 (quite severe or very severe) on this item were categorized as having patient-rated sleep disturbance.
Responses to each of these items were categorized "Weekly" and "Every two weeks" which were included in the questionnaire.
FAO food items were categorized and summed to correspond to each of 12 GDD food categories (Supplemental Table 1).
One other is that more typical items are categorized more efficiently.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com