Sentence examples for each group were categorized from inspiring English sources

The observation codes in each group were categorized into engagement (active and passive) and non-engagement as per BOSS protocol.

The 240 observation codes in each group were categorized into engagement (active and passive) and non-engagement as per BOSS protocol codes.

Participants in the NP transfer group were classified as rule-based if the number of responses to the first presentation of EF was at least one SD below the mean number of responses to the first presentations of E and F. Using this criterion, thirteen participants from each group were categorized as rule-based.

Both groups who received comments only (the C group) and comments followed by scores (the CS group) were categorized into high achiever (HA) and low achiever (LA) categories.

More patients in the MRSA group were categorized as HCAP than in the non-MRSA group (73.1% vs. 45.1%; P < 0.001).

Subjects within the case group were categorized as those having either relatively low (RBP < 34 mg/L; n = 151) or normal (≥ 34 mg/L; n = 128) RBP concentrations.

More than 85% of the adverse events in either group were categorized as grade 1 or 2 (mild or moderate), according the CTCAE scale.

MC group was categorized as an independent branch, indicating a low similarity with others.

The severe AP group is categorized into two subgroups: admission modified Marshall Score <2 or ≥2.

A third group was categorized as being around the mean of the distribution.

Most shoulder complaints in this group are categorized as non-specific.