Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We analyzed seven Illumina cDNA sequencing runs, each a single lane on an Illumina GAII Genome Analyzer, with read lengths of 67 80 bp.
Similar(59)
Consequently, Illumina HiSeq 2500 which produces approximately 500 600 million paired-end reads per lane (Illumina 2015, last accessed December 3, 2015) will enable the parallel processing of 50 glycerid individuals, of 10 million reads each, on a single lane.
Paired-end Illumina sequencing was performed by the Genomics Core at the University of California, Riverside, on cDNA libraries generated using the Illumina mRNA sequencing sample preparation kit with mRNA from three tissue types: (1) venom gland, (2) silk glands and (3) cephalothorax minus venom glands, each in a single lane [ 37].
Caco-2 cells and colon epithelium were sequenced by Illumina Hiseq 2000 as multiplexed samples, while DLD1 and Lovo were each sequenced on a single lane.
This was followed by sequencing of each library on a single lane of Illumina Hi-Seq to produce 100 bp paired end reads, leading to increased mapping accuracy compared to a previous study using single reads [ 12].
We randomly selected 192 individuals from each population (1113 for wild type, and 1052 for recq4a, divided over four replicates), produced two 96-plex libraries, and sequenced each pool in a single lane of an Illumina GAIIx sequencer (Illumina).
Replicates for the watered, S1 and S3 sample libraries were each run on a single lane in a flowcell on an Illumina GAIIx at the Genomics Core Facility at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Replicates for the watered, S1 and S3 sample libraries were each run on a single lane in a flow cell on an Illumina GAIIx at the Genomics Core Facility at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
This process used two 36-cycle sequencing kits with each sample analyzed on a single lane to generate an average of 28 million single-end (75 base pair [bp]) reads.
Each parental library was run in a single lane for 120 cycles for each paired end, and each bulk library for 80 cycles.
Each library was sequenced in a single lane.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com