Sentence examples similar to e proof for from inspiring English sources

Similar(60)

Then the sequence { x n } generated by (2.1) converges strongly to x = Π F x 0, where Π F is the generalized projection of E onto F. Proof For each n = 1, 2, 3, …, N, define G n : C × C → R by G n ( x, y ) = f n ( x, y ) + 〈 A n x, y − x 〉.

Then the operator A has a fixed point in E. Proof For any x ∈ E, since A : E ⟶ E, we have A x ∈ E. Since E is a Banach space with lattice structure, there exists u 0 ∈ E such that inf { A x, x } = u 0. That is, u 0 ≤ A x, u 0 ≤ x. (2.8).

Then I n ′ ( u ) v = ( u, v ) 0 − ∫ 0 σ ( T ) f n ( t, ( u + ) σ ( t ) ) v σ ( t ) Δ t, u, v ∈ E. Lemma 3.5 Assume that (H1) and (H2) hold, then there exists n 0 > 0 such that the functional I n satisfies the P.S. condition in E for n > n 0. Proof For given n, let { u m } ⊆ E be the P.S. sequence of I n, that is, { I n ( u m ) } is bounded and I n ′ ( u m ) → 0 as m → ∞.

Notice that the proof for necessity e-conversion depends on possibility i-conversion, and the proof for possibility i-conversion on necessity e-conversion.

Hence, c is an eigenvalue with corresponding eigenfunction x, i.e., c = sup E ∈ E. This completes the proof for Case (b).

In particular for almost every λ ∈ [ 1, 2 ] there is a bounded sequence { v j } ⊂ E satisfying I λ ( v j ) → c λ and I λ ′ ( v j ) → 0. Proof For the v ∈ E obtained in Lemma 2.2, we have I λ ( v ) ≤ 0. It follows from (H1) that I λ ( v ) ≤ I ( v ) ≤ 0, ∀ λ ∈ [ 1, 2 ].

Proof: Please refer to Appendix E for the proof of this theorem.

Proof For ∀ u ∈ E, T u ( t ) = ∫ 0 1 G ( t, s ) f ( s, u ( s ), C D 0 + σ u ( s ) ) d s, by Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.2, we have T : E → E. Now we separate the proof into three steps.

Theorem 2: The above algorithm yields T i, j (L, M ) = T i, j q (X, Π s (X ) ) and E i (y, L, M ) = E i q (y, X, Π s (X ) ). Proof: The proof for this theorem is very similar to the proof of theorem 1 for Viterbi training and therefore omitted.

Then f ( X ) is an increasing function for X > e. Proof Since f ′ ( X ) = ( log X − 1 ) / ( log X ) 2, we have f ′ ( X ) > 0 for X > e.

I don't have proof for now".

Show more...

Ludwig, your English writing platform

Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.

Student

Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

Get started for free

Unlock your writing potential with Ludwig

Letters

Most frequent sentences: