This demonstrated that the results of the variable-durations modeling did not arise merely because of some unwanted confound (e.g., comparisons between conditions with different durations, or unexplained variance in one or the other multiple-phases model).
Any exonic position which could be labeled as two or more of CDS, 5′UTR, or 3′ UTR depending on the transcript isoform was still counted as exonic, but was excluded from analyses that required positions to be uniquely labeled (e.g., comparisons of translation in 5′ or 3′ UTRs to CDS) unless otherwise noted.
Longitudinal comparisons (e.g. a comparison before and after training) avoid these problems of comparison groups but introduce temporal variation, such as variable yearly rainfall or fluctuating market prices.
It also shows that for between-group comparisons (e.g., a comparison between the uptake of two probes), more subjects will probably be needed to be able to detect a certain absolute average difference between those groups, when the uptake is, on average, high compared to low.
Participants received 10 € as an incentive along with a personal evaluation of their interview (e. g. nutrient intakes in comparison to reference values).
avoid ambiguous terms such as "left", "right", "above" and "below" indicate how you have determined that the object is new (e.g., comparison to named atlases, observation the previous night, etc). and whether you have checked for known supernovae and/or minor planets in the area.
We speculate that abnormal functioning of this network emerged during decision making due to the emphasis on executive processes (e.g., comparison of the SI and CI) and/or retrieval, which are modulated by this system [49].
If two sequences are similar in their rank order of n-tuples, the scattered points will be located near the diagonal line (e.g., comparison between healthy subjects) [17].
Current assignment methods may implicitly assume reciprocal monophyly of closely related species (e.g., comparison of within vs. between species variation); here, we noted only four species that approach well-supported paraphyly (Acer rubrum, A. saccharinum, Dryopteris carthusiana, D. intermedia).
Subsequent pair-wise comparisons (two group comparisons) were calculated to be adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Tukey method (e.g., comparison of RC-101 CVL to placebo CVL at day 8 after the comparison of treatment groups at day 8).
This allows for further study of the pattern's form (e.g., comparison with deterministic dynamic gene regulation models), as well as the model for the noise (e.g., to detect whether noise is additive or multiplicative).
