Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
As has been argued before (e.g., Martin 1999; van der Sluis et al. 2006), transformation of the data is no solution as it will remove both spurious and genuine G × E from the data.
Similar(58)
This approach uses typically variance components σ g 2 and σ e 2 estimated from the data set under investigation.
Although the data have their own merits, including generalizability (e.g., the data come from randomly selected schools from among all public and private high schools in Japan), such quantitative data should be supplemented by emic qualitative data.
Thus, the model allows the determination of E from compression data alone, as the wall thickness is also determined.
Where there were multiple most parsimonious trees (MPTs), or where source trees had been derived from predominantly overlapping data (e.g., from the same data but using alternative methods), we used RadCon [ 65] to produce strict Reduced Cladistic Consensus trees (RCC [ 66, 67]).
Figure 6(A -(E) indicate the data obtained from 24-hour urine samples collected with metabolic cages at 4 and 8 weeks after start of empagliflozin treatment.
Strict BG control in the E phase is significant, from the data indicating that the AS values in the E phase were greater than those in the L phase except BGmin.
The same effect was observed for the correlation of RCBS with E(g) when the data from Karlin et al. were analysed.
The misclassification parameter e* is computed from the data using e * = e · number of serum samples in R 4 number of serum samples in R (1, 4 ) which gives us an approximation of the number of serum samples in R1 through R4 whose antibody titer would be misclassified as R5.
We suggest an engineering method that allows using the known (e.g., from the experiments) data on the depth of penetration of several high-speed impactors for predicting the depth of penetration for the impactors having different shapes.
The clustering of type E strains from the microarray data agrees with that observed in previous studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com