Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(33)
Two tasks were evaluated in each condition: (i) static standing balance and (ii) dynamic standing balance (medio-lateral perturbation).
The Four Square Step Test is a feasible and valid clinical test of dynamic standing balance for use in ambulant people poststroke.
This study evaluated the efficacy of a dynamic standing posture over the stationary standing posture in reducing physical stress using sEMG and psychophysical analysis.
From the sEMG study, it was found that the fatigue rates in leg and lower back muscles were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the stationary standing posture as compared to the dynamic standing posture.
Objectives: To establish the reliability and validity of a new clinical test of dynamic standing balance, the Four Square Step Test (FSST), to evaluate its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value in identifying subjects who fall, and to compare it with 3 established balance and mobility tests.
This is a test of dynamic standing balance.
Similar(27)
Shoulder-robing suggests dynamic standing-up meetings and brief journeys, possibly by helicopter.
There were statistically significant gender differences in the levels of activity as classified by nature of activity, with more males in lowest categories of dynamic and standing activities and the highest categories of static and sitting activities (see Table 2).
The step-test is a functional, dynamic test of standing balance, where the participants stands on one leg in front of a 15 cm step, and places the opposite foot on and off the step as quickly as possible over 15 seconds.
The driving-point dynamic responses of standing people (e.g. their mechanical impedance or apparent mass) influence their dynamic interactions with structures on which they are supported.
Conclusions: Age-related changes in gait, characterized by reduced peak hip extension and increased anterior pelvic tilt, are dynamic rather than standing postural processes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com