Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Another conservative economist, Greg Mankiw, describes dynamic scoring as an exercise in "estimating the feedback effects of tax proposals".
Dynamic scoring versus static scoring is at the heart of a wonky debate in Washington, D.C., and economists differ widely on which method is better, and how much macroeconomic effects you can assume in dynamic scoring.
The choice between static or dynamic scoring further complicates any estimate of revenue-neutral rates.
Dynamic scoring is fine in theory.
In budget lexicon, this is called dynamic scoring.
And it costs, with dynamic scoring, less than a trillion dollars.
It relies on $147 billion in additional revenue from "dynamic scoring," a more generous accounting method.
In other words, there's a new disease in town: dynamic scoring abuse.
The dynamic scoring rule, as adopted, simply imposes conservative assumptions about economic policy on budgetary accounting.
The absence of Clarke in the lineup cost Butler his dynamic scoring.
Dynamic scoring was repeatedly used in the early years of the Bush presidency to justify his signature tax cuts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com