Suggestions(1)
Exact(10)
The FDP-BIEM enables realistic simulations for dynamic earthquake rupture processes.
This problem was originally defined for the SCEC (Southern California Earthquake Center/U.S. Geological Survey) Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Code Verification Exercise (Harris et al., 2009).
This model is then verified by comparing the results obtained from the dynamic earthquake analysis carried out by using Perform 3D with the experimental ones.
Concurrently with an increased understanding of the complex modes of fault slip in subduction zones, our understanding of plate-boundary faulting associated with dynamic earthquake rupture and slow earthquakes has progressed.
Examination of fault rocks exhumed from various depths in subduction zones is essential in order to understand fault slip behaviors such as dynamic earthquake rupture, low-frequency tremor and earthquakes, slow slip events, and post-seismic and interseismic creep.
The high magnetic susceptibility in the 589.25-m-depth sample is directly proportional to χferri, and the high Ms may show that new minerals with low Hc were formed during dynamic earthquake faulting.
Similar(50)
For the earthquake scenarios, we used the physics-based Nankai Trough earthquake scenarios obtained from quasi-dynamic earthquake cycle simulations, as discussed in the following.
Moreover, aseismic events recently observed in the Nankai Trough region have also been successfully modeled in the framework of quasi-dynamic earthquake cycle model.
Hence, in the quasi-dynamic earthquake cycle simulation with a large sub-fault number N, direct evaluation of Eq. 4 requires a large memory for G ij, and it becomes the most time-consuming process.
Hyodo and Hori (2013) proposed a model of Mw9-class Nankai Trough earthquakes based on quasi-dynamic earthquake-cycle simulations.
However, the slip distributions shown in Figures 3 and 6 were formed during a period from the beginning of the earthquake to 1,000 s afterwards in the quasi-dynamic earthquake-cycle simulation (see 'Methods' section).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com