Sentence examples for duty to define from inspiring English sources

Government has a clear duty to promote scientific discovery -- and a duty to define certain boundaries: Under my policy, existing stem cell lines, to be used in publicly supported research, must be derived (1) with the informed consent of donors, (2) from excess embryos created solely for reproductive purposes and (3) without any financial inducements to the donors.

1. Griffin Bell, attorney general under Jimmy Carter, once wrote of the "tension between the attorney general's duty to define the legal limits of executive action in a neutral manner and the president's desire to receive legal advice that helps him do what he wants".

Since he is an admirer of the state-of-the-nation play, he approves of this development, and his principal criticism of the post-war era is that the theatre has sometimes failed in its duty to define exactly what is rotten in the state of Britain.This can make him a killjoy.

Ruth is a man in love with his work who feels it's his duty to define and preserve the quality of life.

But on the margins, the extent of these duties can be hard to define.An article published last year in the Columbia Business Law Review by Stephen Crimmins, a lawyer formerly with the SEC, shows the tension.

Rule 10b5-2 purporto to define the "duty of trust" whose breach can give rise to insider trading liability under the misappropriation theory (see O'Hagan below).

Not only is the government proposing a regulator that would handle the direct enforcement action, but the regulator will then have to define a duty of care that internet companies must provide.

Fiduciary duty is not always easy to define, but lawyers often cite the words of Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo, who described it in 1928 as "not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most sensitive". They also maintain that the "suitability" or "know your customer" standard customarily applied to brokers and bankers isn't enough anymore.

It is clear that to rely upon the presumed consent argument to define the duty to treat will not make our collective response to potential epidemics such as SARS or avian 'flu any more effective or robust.

And if the presence or absence of consent is used as a criterion to define the duty to treat, in addition the existing flexibilities, then a mechanism would be created by which HCWs may freely, and perhaps excessively, discriminate among patients.

The scientific community needs a code to define their duties and responsibilities.