Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(18)
Rgs7 −/− mice showed significant impairment during the test trial with a novel object in comparison with wild-type littermates.
Figure 3 shows that the hippocampal group spent more time in the correct corner during the test trial than in the nearer of the two white corners.
Indeed, the basic measure was the time spent by the mice exploring objects during the sample phases and during the test trial.
Dependent measures from the test trials included: number of incorrect arm entries (Errors) during the test trial; mean Latency to reach platform (total latency divided by arms entered, i.e., an indirect index of swim speed); and the position (or type) of the First Error during the test trial (where an error occurred).
A measure of support for this second alternative is provided by the finding that both groups spent a very small amount of time in the wrong corners during the test trial.
The left-hand panel of Figure 3 shows the mean percentages of time spent by the two groups in the four corners of the square arena during the test trial after the completion of passive training.
Similar(42)
Following pre-exposure to distressed object mice, B6 subjects also expressed enhanced acquisition of conditioned fear (relative to other groups) during the test trials in which they were directly exposed to the paired CS-UCS contingency (test trials 7-10).
The priming stimulation was held constant across trials and was delivered at a pulse frequency that had been shown previously to support vigorous responding; the remaining parameters were the same as those used during the test trials.
All successful chimpanzees who used the same method as model A may have been directly influenced by this model during the observation period, but indirect influences may also have occurred during the test trials, if new performers watched each other.
Likewise, subjects were asked about pain during the test trials.
Participants did not receive augmented feedback during the test trials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com